Service Lists
Service Lists
Decisions & Notices
Decisions & Notices
STB Reports
STB Reports
Filings
Filings
Recordations
Recordations
Correspondence >
Correspondence >
Research Aids >
Research Aids >
Transcripts, Statements
Transcripts, Statements
E-Publications
E-Publications
Studies
Studies
Rail Customer and Public Assistance
Rail Customer and Public Assistance
Rail Shipper Council
Rail Shipper Council
Grain Car Council
Grain Car Council
Rail Energy Transportation Advisory Committee
Rail Energy Transportation Advisory Committee
Economic Data >
Economic Data >
Merger Data
Merger Data
Agricultural Contract Summaries
Agricultural Contract Summaries
Office of Environmental Analysis
Office of Environmental Analysis
Environmental Rules
Environmental Rules
Guide to Environmental Rules
Guide to Environmental Rules
Key Cases
Key Cases
Environmental Correspondence
Environmental Correspondence
Glossary
Glossary
Third Party Contracting
Third Party Contracting
Environmental Contact List
Environmental Contact List
Historic Preservation
Historic Preservation
Resources >
Resources >
Inquiries >
Inquiries >
What's New
What's New
News Releases
News Releases
Testimony & Speeches
Testimony & Speeches
Receive STB News >
Receive STB News >
Site Visits
Site Visits
Board Members
Board Members
Overview
Overview
Organizational Chart
Organizational Chart
< Offices
< Offices
Past Board Members
Past Board Members
Annual Reports
Annual Reports
Budget Submissions >
Budget Submissions >
Jobs
Jobs
Annual Employee Surveys
Annual Employee Surveys
Administrative Issuances
Administrative Issuances
Environmental
Environmental
STB Statutes
STB Statutes
STB Rules
STB Rules
Federal Register
Federal Register
Legislation
Legislation
Financial & Statistical Reports
Financial & Statistical Reports
URCS
URCS
Waybill
Waybill
RCAF
RCAF
Rail Rate Studies
Rail Rate Studies
Depreciation
Depreciation
Rate Cases
Rate Cases
How To File
How To File
Filing Fees
Filing Fees
Abandonment
Abandonment
Construction Cases
Construction Cases
Rails-To-Trails
Rails-To-Trails
Rail Line Sales
Rail Line Sales
ICC Information
ICC Information
Public
Public
Congressional
Congressional
Media
Media
Library
Library
GC
GC
OE
OE
OEA
OEA
OMD
OMD
OP
OP
OPAGAC
OPAGAC
2013
2013
2012
2012
2011
2011
2010
2010
2009
2009
2008
2008
2007 Human Capital Study Results
2007 Human Capital Study Results
2008 Human Capital Study (HCS)
2008 Human Capital Study (HCS)
2008 HCS Trend Report
2008 HCS Trend Report
2010 Federal Viewpoint Survey
2010 Federal Viewpoint Survey
2011 Federal Viewpoint Survey
2011 Federal Viewpoint Survey
| | | |
FOR RELEASE | | Contact: Dennis Watson |
03/03/2011 (Thursday) | | |
No. 11-08 | |
(202) 245-0238
FIRS 1 (800) 877-8339
|
| | |
| | www.stb.dot.gov |
| | | |
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD ISSUES DECISION ON COAL DUST |
| | | |
The Surface Transportation Board
today acknowledged that coal dust poses a serious problem for railroad
safety and operations, but found that BNSF Railway Company's attempt to
mitigate those problems was not reasonable.
Arkansas Electric Cooperative
Corp. had asked the Board to prevent BNSF from using a rail side
emission monitoring system that sought to measure coal dust blowing from
the top of coal cars. If a certain emission standard was exceeded, the
shipper of the cars would have been subject to unspecified enforcement
measures.
The Board acknowledged the safety
and maintenance issues brought on by coal dust fouling track ballast.
And it found that BNSF may require shippers to take "reasonable
measures" to address the problem. But the Board found the provisions of
BNSF's tariff "not reasonable" given the level of uncertainty and the
available methods to control coal dust.
"Under the challenged tariff, the
railroad would accept rail cars loaded with coal and then inform coal
shippers at a later date whether and to what extent coal dust was
released during transport," the decision said. "In addition, the tariff
does not explain what consequences coal shippers would face if they are
found to have tendered loaded coal cars to the railroad that
subsequently released coal dust during transport. The challenged tariff
also does not acknowledge any steps that, if taken by a shipper before
coal cars are tendered to the railroad, would guarantee that the shipper
would be deemed in compliance with the tariff."
The decision went on to say,
"Rather than using this decision to define a specific,
government-approved approach to the problem at hand, we expect the
railroads and their customers will collaborate to develop a solution
that guarantees that loaded rail cars are fit for safe travel, while
also ensuring that commodity spillage during transport is minimized.''
The full record of Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation-Petition for Declaratory Order, Docket No. FD 35305, can be found at www.stb.dot.gov. |
| | | |
This page has been accessed 4990 times since 03/03/2011 12:02 PM |
| | | |